Metropolis is an international network for comparative research and public policy development on migration, diversity, and immigrant integration in cities in Canada and around the world Search image1 Search image3
Search image2

The International Metropolis Project is a forum for bridging research, policy and practice on migration and diversity.
The Project aims to enhance academic research capacity, encourage policy-relevant research on migration and diversity issues,
and facilitate the use of that research by governments and non-governmental organizations.

 
nav line Home nav line About Us nav line Research and Policy nav line Events nav line Partners nav line Publications nav line Contact Us
  
 

Programming the flow of migration for work motives.

The Italian case

 

By Laura Zanfrini, ISMU Foundation, Milan

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore*, Milan

l.zanfrini@ismu.org - laura.zanfrini@mi.unicatt.it

 

 

      On the basis of a recent investigation[1], in this contribution we will confront one of the "hottest" questions of the current debate on immigration-programming the flow of immigration for work motives. As is well known, the choice of the Italian legislator to explicitly plan each year the number of entry visas for foreign workers has no equal in the current European scene of migration policies (excepting Spain), and to find similar procedures one must look overseas to Canada, Australia, and the United States. Yet it is also obvious that the size of those nations and their specific historical vicissitudes make their experiences very different from the Italian one.

At the end of the 60s and the beginning of the 70s, Central-Northern European countries began a stop policy that ended the possibility of legal entry for work motives; a consequence of the crisis of those industries which had previously asked for and utilized foreign labor (but in many ways this was independent from the economic circumstance and had more political than economic reasons). Legal entry for work motives remained circumscribed in the following years to very special cases and it was not until the early 90s that Germany re-opened the channel of guest workers by carefully defining with the countries of origin agreements that exclude the renewal of contracts, preclude family reunification and do not allow contracts to be open ended. The policies of blockade still define the decision-making picture of the principal European countries in matters of immigration and they have consolidated a sort of "restrictive orthodoxy" based on the assumption that their economies no longer need immigrant work[2].

After clarifying that, we must note that this difference is more apparent than real since once we go back to the empirical concrete phenomenon an analysis shows that worker immigration continued during the period of formal closure of borders by using procedures like those of political refugees, family reunification and by increasing illegal/clandestine immigration. Besides, maybe because of the Italian example, many European countries have taken up the theme of re-opening their borders to foreign workers; Spain has adopted a law that is similar to ours, and France and England have started to debate the issue. There are good reasons to believe that in the next few years this theme will become one of the principal issues of the European debate on immigration.

The present contribution proposes in the first section a quick review of the principal policy trends that regulate the participation of immigrants in the labor market on an international level. In the second section we will review the processes that define the characteristics of foreign participation in the Italian economy, recalling the open perspectives of the new law on immigration. Finally, in the third section we will illustrate the data gathered with the Excelsior information system that relates to the professional needs for foreign labor.

 

 

3.2.4     The policy of programming entry quotas in the context of migration policies on an international level.

If the securatisation of the migration question is (as we have shown more than once in the ISMU Italian Report on Migrations) the dominant trait of the current international scene it is also clear that the fight against illegal immigration effectively represents the leitmotiv of almost all legislations in matters of migration. Although one cannot but recognize the ambiguities and contradictions inherent in blockade policies, which seem oblivious to the need for foreign labor (which is not merely circumstantial) that Western economies continue to demonstrate[3]. The fight against illegality primarily utilizes instruments such as the strengthening and externalizing of border controls, and making expulsions effective, all aspects that we have discussed in the 1999 and 2000 editions of the ISMU Italian Report on Migrations[4]. Nevertheless, we must also remember other preventive measures such as the conclusion of bilateral agreements with the countries of origin, the strengthening of international cooperation (two measures that aim to lessen the pressure of illegal migration), and above all the strengthening of control on job sites since the fight against the informal/illegal economy can inhibit the principal factor of attraction (and of "construction"[5]) of illegal immigration-the possibility of finding a job independently from having a sojourn permit. Finally, another measure is the use of periodic amnesties that "cancel" past illegalities which is a practice used in many places outside the borders of our country.

A second trend that recurs on the international level is the introduction of filters at the entry level which are not merely based on traditional criteria (the country of origin having a privileged relationship with the country of entry or the fact of having relatives who are prior immigrants) but also based on the possession of professional qualifications and credentials. The reasons for this choice are many, it tries to satisfy the needs of the economic system (for example the demand for personnel with information system qualifications is very generalized) but it also wants to stimulate the arrival of subjects with a "high potential" whom, it is supposed, will contribute to the national economy independently from the actual "open" job positions. In this perspective for example, the immigration of business men and entreprenuers is pushed. It is interesting to note that in certain cases the objective of this expectation is even more "sophisticated", it attempts to prevent the phenomena of an ethnicization of the job market (considered not only disadvantageous for ethnic minorities but also dysfunctional for both the economy and society of the host country) by selecting subjects who can legitimately aspire to an non-subalternate inclusion. One can note an integration between this filter and the traditional ones. In Canada for example, a pilot project begun in 1998 attempts to push family reunification for those foreign workers who have a high qualification and even potential refugees are chosen based on their professional profile.

A third tendency is to push for temporary immigration. Generally this choice is justified with seasonal needs (such as agricultural work or tourism) or temporary work (the realization of large construction sites) or the need to fill a circumstantial lack of balance in the job market. Yet we cannot deny the objective of preventing those problems that come with the settling of immigrant populations (the German experience is an example of this which has already been mentioned). The temporariness of this presence concurs with the proliferation of programs meant to increase the circulation of professional elites and young people who are studying (to cite one of the most widely recognized, the Erasmus program).

The regulation of immigration for family and humanitarian reasons constitutes a fourth trend that can be noted internationally and particularly on the European level. As we noted above, the advent of restrictive policies in matters of immigration for work has allowed for an increase in entries based on reunification and humanitarian protection, entries that translate in an unplanned growth in job supply. This is a phenomena which in many ways cannot be controlled by governments, and as it has been pointed out it represents one of the costs which democratic societies pay for maintaining the values that they are based on[6]. It is the regime of embedded liberalism which composes their juridical framework that constitutes the major offence against the restrictive orthodoxy of which we spoke, and not a technical or political incapacity in controlling the flow of migration. Nevertheless, various countries tend to control the phenomena with solutions such as the stiffening of requirements for family reunification (increasing financial guarantees, limiting family members who can request reunification, and the denial of this right to temporary migrants) and for the recognition of the right to humanitarian protection (the most important example of this is the Dublin convention with which the governments of European Union have established the impossibility of re-presenting a request that has already been turned down by a member country but in general they have tried to render the process faster). Another series of measures aims to circumscribe the possibility of access to the job market by limiting the possibility on the basis of the status which regulates the sojourn, to the length of the sojourn, to the type of sojourn permit that a foreigner who requests family reunification possesses and so on. The choice of excluding from work possibilities those categories of foreigners is meant to prevent an improper use of entry procedures for family motives and above all humanitarian ones. It is also meant to protect aucthotonous workers from foreign competition yet it brings consequences such as the growth of illegal work ("in nero") and a burden to the State treasury of maintaining (even for many months) asylum seekers who are not allowed to work and in the case of a refusal it is very difficult to deport a subject (often a family) who is regularly working. Several countries have started programs, for those who in a certain period had humanitarian protection, that are an incentive to return home once the reasons for this status have disappeared. Similar projects are those initiatives which support the social and professional placement of second generation immigrants; these initiatives not only have the objective of promoting equal opportunity policy, but also that of fighting unemployment situations that ethnic minorities must confront almost everywhere in worse conditions than the local workers.

 In any case, the promotion of equal opportunity means paying more attention to the policies applied to first generation immigrants (and the following generations) since awareness has grown that the discrimination of which they are victims is not merely a morally deplorable phenomena, (which is also contrary to the constitutions of the various countries) but also a cause of brain wasting and therefore a factor that places in jeopardy the correct functioning of the labor market by increasing segmentation. As we have noted before, besides trying to contain the risks of exclusion and social marginality these policies aim to enhance the value and potential that immigration is able to express, especially of those immigrants who have professional qualifications. In certain cases, the objectives that inspire these policies are those of preventing union problems due to the phenomena of "unfair competition" induced by the presence of labor that is adaptable and cheap. In other cases it combats the beginning of the ethnicization of certain jobs which ends up strengthening the resistance of the most marginal groups of local labor in accepting those same jobs. The objective of promoting better chances for immigrants by the reporting of discriminatory practices is, in many ways, connected to the fight against racism and xenophobia. Several countries have started campaigns to sensitize public opinion, invested resources in monitoring attitudes toward immigrants, in analyses of discriminatory phenomenon, and in the training and re-qualification of those who work in employment offices (this also comes from the example of interventions from supranational institutions such as the European Union).

Finally, another trend of international migration policies has been to recognize the relationship between economic inclusion and social integration. This means to ascertain (as we will do when we analyse the Italian case) how it is an illusion to think that the policies which regulate the participation of immigrants in the labor market, such as the one on entry quotas, can leave out parallel actions that project and implement social integration, beginning with housing integration but not only that. This means not only for new comers, but also for the second and following generations. In the case of France for example, once the limits of the assimilationist approach had become clear what stood out was that the descendents of immigrant families (even when French citizens) found themselves with a mass of accumulated disadvantages which derived not only from their ethnic origins, but also from the condition of housing segregation that many of them were born and grew up in (the banlieuses of the major cities, also called areas of risk) and sometimes by unsuccessful school experiences[7]. If the variables to be considered are multiple then the problems that need to be confronted are very complex, and in a final analysis they call into question the entire working order of the host society. From this recognition, government authorities in various countries, both local and national, have promoted actions that train and sensitize, and developed interventions to prevent neglect (for example in school settings) urged on by the diffusion of so-called best practices.

By putting together these trends, which in some way represent the answers to the problems and opportunities that migration phenomenon pose on an international level, we can define the horizon in which it is possible to single out the multiple objectives of a policy that programs entry quotas. The latter, while it is formally finalized to satisfy the needs of the economic system (and of families since a large quota of immigration finds work with them) is at the same time "condemned" to keep track of a whole series of restrictions: first of all the requirement to contain the pressure of illegal migration by making the legal channel more advantageous; the requirement to respect established constitutional principles, sealed by international agreements[8] that concern the possibility for the migrant to be reunited with family members and humanitarian protection, and the fact that the countries of the European Union must harmonize their laws and regulations with that of the other member States and with EU directives (this is an aspect which still needs to be clarified but it cannot be excluded that in the future Italy will have to change its national regulations in this matter). Further regulations that are less pressing in the immediate situation but which must, or should, constitute points that need to be taken care of in the medium and long term are represented by the opportunity of strengthening regional economic integration and international cooperation with the countries of origin and the opportunity to prevent as much as possible the ethnicization of work relations. Finally, as we already emphasized, no programming policy on entry quotas can evade the need to sustain the complicated process of integrating immigrant workers into the social web of the host society, with a view toward their professional promotion.

 

3.2.2     Characteristics of immigrant participation in the Italian labor market and the prospects opened up by the unified law on immigration

The characteristics of immigrant participation in the Italian labor market are now sufficiently well known and the subject of thorough studies in the various editions of ISMU Italian Report. In this paper we will limit ourselves to examining a series of processes that are immediately pertinent to the question of programming new entries.

The first process is that of a demographic exchange in that part of the population which is working age, with which we mean the compensation function of the decrease in the Italian population determined by natural movements; which must both maintain the volume of productive forces on an adequate level to sustain labor demand and also sustain the contributive (tax) system. Indeed the senario outlined by demographers defines an insidious arena of debate.[9] To those who fear that immigration (especially in the context of a demographic decrease in population) entails the irreversible modification of a people's hereditory characteristics are opposed those who (on a different but equally critical position) denounce the exquisitely instrumental vision of the phenomena that lies behind similar representations. As regards the objectives of this present reflexion we will limit ourselves to observing how often, especially in the regions that associate a dynamic economic situation with a rapidly aging population, after those jobs that locals refuse to fill, the foreign presence appears to be clearly destined to fulfill a structural function by substituting workmen who arrive at retirement age. Although up to this point the process of demographic exchange has turned out to be an ethnicization of labor relations (a phenomena which we will return to later), the forecast data illustrates a clear tendency for foreign workers to spread out into the different production sectors, mainly in those areas of the country in which the stabilization process is more advanced.

A second process concerns the territorial diversification of job hiring conditions which is justified by the chronic North/South dualism that characterizes the national economy but also by the less severe but still unbalanced situations that can be seen on a sub-regional level. The spatial distribution of the hirings of foreign and immigrant workers by firms represents the most eloquent indicator of the phenomena which we are interested in, a phenomena confirmed, as we shall see later, by the same data relative to expected future hirings. Many authors have also observed that it is possible to identify different territorial models of immigrant inclusion. If it is true that among the various dimensions of integration there is no deterministic and unilinear relation, then it is also true that the hiring conditions of the job market tend to go along with recurring situations from the point of view of social integration, creating configurations that are in many ways ideal. The local society approach seems to be essential both for describing the inclusion processes of the new comers into Italian society, and also for examining the mechanisms that regulate living together harmoniously and what promotional actions need be taken to achieve this. What is at stake here is not only the question of the allocation of jurisdiction and resources, (for example, the regions demanding their right to legislate both quantity and composition of the new immigration) but also an awareness of the deep inter-relations that exist between the productive sphere and the social reproductive sphere, as immigration demonstrates.

A third aspect concerns precisely the inter-relation between these two spheres, that of inclusion in the productive system and integration into the social web. An effective formula coined in the beginning of the 90s spoke of the difference between "an economic citizenship" and "a social citizenship"[10]. The first was substantially reached (even if it remained invisible) while the second was still missing. The following reflexion has not ceased to reveal the risk of a discontinuity between the various dimensions of inclusion, a risk which indisputably grows stronger in the post-fordist economic scene, caused by the weakening of all the traditional integration agencies. Job hiring remains the best road for integration but by itself it is not sufficient to guarantee the stability of immigrant populations and above all it cannot remove inter-ethnic conflict-not even when the presence of immigrants is clearly required by the economic system. Concerning our theme, this means that professional job hiring alone cannot consititute the only horizon for programming entry policies since what is needed is a wider integration into society, in all its various local specifics. This is the wise trend that the European Union has taken recently on the theme of work policies for immigrants. As for the Italian situation, it is well known that the housing problem is the main stumbling block in the path of immigrants entering the social web. Even if this is a national problem it is still within the most economically dynamic local societies which use foreign labor that it becomes a crucial point concerning the results of inter-ethnic co-habitation. These aspects have been examined in various editions of the ISMU Italian Report and they emphasize how the marginality of foreigners in the housing market consitutes a substantial component of an inclusionary model shared by the host society, which resolutely balks at taking up a perspective of equality concerning access to opportunites and social rewards.

The fourth process we wish to point out is consistent with this model of subordinate inclusion, the ethnicization of the job market, which in Italy, as elsewhere, constitutes one of the most significant components of job market segmentation. To this, and the correlated phenomenon of discrimination and disqualification of foreign labor, we have dedicated a paper in the 1999 edition of the Italian Report on Migrations[11]. We however want to underline how the ethnicization of labor relations is in a certain sense the other face of the complementarity that has allowed the hiring of thousands of immigrants in an economy, the Italian one, that has not been spared from unemployment problems. As we illustrated earlier, this is not only due to the progresive thinning out of the active part of the population, a joint effect of birth rates and length of schooling, but above all with the phenomena of the selectivity of autochthonous job supply. The latter, as a large series of analyses show, seems to be less malleable regarding the selection of job offers which instead is very widespread among first generation immigrants. This is valid even in the Southern regions that have high levels of unemployment in which job seekers, especially the young, appear determined to find a job in the primary labor market The most visible sign of the ethnicization of labor concerns the work segregation of immigrant labor in certain jobs and sectors of the economic system (sectorial segregation would seem to be lessened in forecasts), phenomenon which strongly affects the female component of immigrant job supply. As we have already described in an other paper[12], what helps this is not only the composition of the demand but also the strategies of job supply, shaped by ethnic networks and other informal channels which increase the risk of exposure to discrimination in both entry and career since they do not utilize universal procedures based on certifying aptitude and competency.

Discrimination phenomenon which we just referred to, shows up in different ways: as discrimination at the entry level, discrimination in working conditions, and discrimination in the career path. For the treatment of these subjects we refer readers to our paper on this matter.

 The same thing concerns the disqualification of educated foreign labor, which is one of the most visible demonstrations of discrimination. The aspect which merits examing and underlining is how the trend in programming new entry quotas can contribute in increasing this phenomena in the proportion in which it aims to satisfy the unfulfilled needs of our labor market relating to low profile jobs and seasonal activities. This is an apparently opposite trend to the widespread international strategy that is based (as we noted earlier) on the selection of labor with a high potential even when regulating family reunification or humanitarian entries. Since obviously the quota policy cannot avoid the need to respond to the demands of the economic system, it seems that attention should be placed not on a generalized introduction of filters which award higher professional qualifications (notwithstanding the timid openings contained in the 2001 decree in favor of the entry of qualified workers) but on possible paths to professional mobility for foreigners who are already in the labor market. These paths could also follow that of becoming entrepreneurs by helping a propensity which is widespread among immigrant populations. What however needs to be strictly controlled is the risk that the push toward independent work (confirmed by the new decree on flows which raised last years quota) hides a strategy of unloading on immigrant workers the risk of new enterprises, forcing them to work independently instead of hiring them. In general terms, the selection of emigrant candidates should occur by valorizing their knowledge and professional competencies, along with their availability to invest in their own professional development.

Finally, we must mention that process which certain scholars define as the social construction of illegality[13]. While work has always constituted the primary motivation for foreigners in our country (it is still at the top of the list of reasons for sojourn permits although the increase in family reunifications has augmented permits for family motives) for a long time the legislative scene has been an obstacle for legal entries for work. In addition, the underground or illegal economy is widespread in our country, especially in the South (where it represents about a fourth of employment) but also in the North. There are particular concentrations in certain sectors which have a high percentage of immigrants such as, construction, industrial cleaning, restaurant work, domestic labor, and artisanal sub-order companies (besides Mediterranean agriculture and street vending); all these sectors have favored the absorption of immigrants. On the basis of available estimates from the 1990s the quota of immigrants illegally working has never been lower than 31%, more than double of that of locals. Paradoxically the legalization (having a sojourn permit) of the immigrant presence risks becoming counterproductive when it comes to finding an illegal job since an illegal foreigner is more vulnerable and as such appears more attractive to an employer who is outside of the law. Therefore we must observe how with time the illegal jobs of immigrants have become more similar to that of Italians, since the number of those who work illegally ("in nero") has increased even if they could have a regular job since they have a sojourn permit for work, and the number of those who have to work illegally because they are without permits has diminished-a circimstance that confirms the strong absorbent ability of the underground economy.

The processes that we have referred to outline an inclusionary model for immigrants which is certainly more consistent with the expectations of the Italian population then it is with that of immigrant workers-especially those who are young and educated. As we have noted, for certain aspects the policy of programming new entry quotas would seem to be destined to upholding and strengthening the current trends, especially where it singles out the complementarity between autochthonous and immigrant supply as the principle which inspires the policy of defining quotas. Which is like saying that immigrants must continue to work only in those jobs that Italians refuse or are not enough to fill, regardless of their competencies or credentials. However for other aspects the scene outlined by the unified law on immigration prefigures the possibility of an evolution by opening up the opportunity of legal entry also for work motives. It establishes the obligation for employers and sponsors to find suitable housing solutions and to single out useful paths for valorizing and promoting immigrant professionality. This last objective comes from the so-called "second generation agreements" that are being defined by different emigration countries in which the emphasis is on the quality of job offers which this interrupts the hegemony of the necessary quantity of work.

 These aspects are within the wake of a conspicuous series of bilateral agreements, from 1997 onwards fifteen agreements of readmission have been put in force and six others have been signed while negotiations with seven countries has begun and contacts taken with another five. "To give full validity to this agreement" can be read in the in the draft of the programming Document for the period of 2001-2003, " real packages of measures have been put together that can include in certain cases, direct assistance, development cooperation, but also privileged quotas of worker immigration". The bilateral agreements are placed at the crossing of two fundamental dimensions implicated in the policy of programming entry quotas, the economic and the political, and they "crystallize" the objectives, worries, and ties of this policy.

 

3.2.4     The needs of Italian companies

 The Excelsior Information System, promoted by Unioncamere in collaboration with the Minister of Labor and the European Union, each year conducts a survey on the professional needs of Italian companies. Having arrived at the third edition relating to the two year period of 1999-2000 it has forecast for the first time, with a specific thoroughness, the hiring of personnel from countries outside the European Union.

It is precisely this which we will discuss in this chapter, limiting ourselves however to recalling the most significant data[14]. In many aspects the trends that are reported by companies confirm the territorial diversification of the hiring paths of immigrants in our labor market and also its growing ethnicization. Yet the data however offers unexpected or counter-intuitive indications, prefiguring a progressive widening of the environments of job entry for foreign labor and also a consistent propensity to use this labor shared even by Southern companies. The survey reports, in reference to the two year period of 1999-2000, 818,000 new hirings and among these only 28% were subsitutions of retiring workers-data that expresses a tendency to renew the stock of employees. More than one hiring in three (34.6%) concerns workers that are considered difficult to find. It is above all exactly for this motive, the difficulty of recruiting which concerns certain positions, that a small number of companies (almost 7% or ¼ of companies which hire) declare themselves willing to use of foreign labor. The need for personnel coming from countries outside the European Union is estimated in 200,589 units, representing less than a ¼ of the total hirings. The data speaks by itself and it is eloquent as far as the structural need for foreign labor which characterizes the system of Italian companies; recalling that normally the recourse to immigrant labor is done only when it has been verified that there is a difficulty in finding Italian personnel. This number would certainly be higher if we consider the requests for foreign labor in seasonal jobs and we must recall the pressure that exists in this sense which is testifyed to by the requests for specific quotas. In this way we must remember that the observations do not cover the demand expressed by families that consist in another increase in numbers.

 The propensity to utilize foreign labor is evidently associated with the occupational situations of the different areas of the country [cfr. Table 1], it arrives at 34.8% (more than one hiring in three!) in the case of rich and dynamic regions of the North East (77, 947 hirings of foreigners). But it is without a doubt remarkable in the Center (22.2%), the North West (20.8%), and even in the South and Islands (19%) notwithstanding the chronic lack of employment in these last areas. A true mirror of the characteristics of the host society, immigration uncovers the "voluntary" nature of autochthonous unemployment and the evident mismatch between demand and supply of labor. It also reflects the specificity of the economic system of the different areas in the national territory both by sector and by that of the average size of companies. More than 60% of foreign workers is destined to work in companies that have up to 50 employees. In the majority of cases hiring is not subordinated to the requirement of experience but to that of age. More than a 1/3 of companies believe that they need to train their workers, an important point that indicates a propensity to confer stability to the working relationship even if the average value synthesizes different situations in various professions.

 

 

Tab.1 - Forecast of hirings for the period 1999-2000 of personnel coming from non-European countries, by region.

Regions

Hirings 1999-2000

A.V. *

Hirings 1999-2000

% of total

 

Companies that

have fewer than 50

employees

Piemonte

16,176

21,9

48.4

Valle d'Aosta

635

27,1

79.1

Lombardy

36,301

20,5

54.2

Liguria

3,759

19.1

60.3

Total North West

56,871

20.8

53.3

Trentino Alto Adige

6,849

36.4

63.5

Veneto

30,781

34.6

62.6

Friuli Venezia Giulia

8,217

35.1

60.4

Emilia Romagna

32,100

34.6

52.4

Total North East

77,947

34.8

58.2

Tuscany

12,239

23.3

74.8

Umbria

2,869

25.8

76.3

 The Marches

5,981

24.3

74.2

Lazio

12,040

19.7

61.3

Total Center

33,129

22.2

69.9

Abruzzo

3,190

17.6

78.1

Molise

820

25.9

91.5

Campania

7,981

18.1

79.6

Puglia

5,983

17.5

75.4

Basilicata

1,533

22.6

82.5

Calabria

3,102

23.2

91.3

Sicily

6,691

19.0

82.5

Sardinia

3,342

20.2

78.6

Total South/Islands Isole

32,642

19.0

80.7

Total Italy

200.589

24.5

62,4

* The absolute value reported above should be understood as a potential number of hirings of non-European determined on the basis of indications from companies that are willing to to hire this personnel.

 

 

Tab.2 - Forecast hirings in the two year period 1999-2000 of personnel coming from non-European countries, by activity sectors.

 

       Hirings

1999-2000

                           Of which

 

 A. V..*

% of total

Companies   > 50

Employees.

With experience

Without

experience

With the need for

job training

Less than < 25 yrs old

Industry

113,580

28.4

73,4

50,0

50,0

33,2

33,2

Mining

632

29.5

81.6

64.7

35.3

22.2

22.3

Food, drink and tobacco industries

4,671

20.6

65.6

34.2

65.8

3.8

40.5

Textile and clothing industries

10,070

30.1

68.6

50.5

49.5

39.5

33.0

Leather, skins and shoe industries

3,686

32.7

72.8

51.1

48.9

29.7

34.4

Wood and wood product industries (excluding furniture)

3,185

33.6

87.8

47.3

52.7

33.4

37.1

Paper, and printing industries

1,699

14.1

58.9

31.4

68.6

44.7

42.6

Coal and petroleum industries

59

7.5

42.4

35.6

64.4

27.1

--

Chemical and synthetic industries

1,933

14.9

29.4

27.2

72.8

44.6

33.7

Rubber and plastic industries

3,953

31.7

59.7

24.8

75.2

43.2

39.5

Mineral industries (non metal)

4,066

26.4

63.1

40.9

59.1

36.3

37.0

Metal industries

14,140

25.2

68.8

44.1

55.9

41.9

38.2

Mecchanical industries and transportation

11,892

22.7

46.2

47.0

53.0

49.3

36.7

Eletrical and electronic industries

5,646

19.3

54.1

34.2

65.8

47.4

51.8

Other manufacturing industries

5,189

28.4

75.7

46.1

53.9

35.7

38.8

Energy, gas and water

715

14.6

14.8

58.7

41.3

24.1

16.9

Construction

42,044

39.8

91.6

61.8

38.2

19.7

25.4

 
Hirings

1999-2000

Of which:

 

A.V.

% of

 total

Companies > 50

employees

with

experience

Without

experience

With the

Need for

Job training

With < 25 years of age

Services

87,009

20.8

48.1

40.2

59.8

38.8

27.0

Wholesale and retail trade and repairs

21,686

16.7

62.6

44.4

55.6

39.1

40.1

Hotels, tourism villages, restaurants, bars and cafeterias

13,280

29.1

70.2

49.4

50.6

28.3

37.6

Transportation,travel agencies, mailand telecommunications

10,082

18.5

34.4

40.6

59.4

30.3

20.7

Credit and financial attivities

526

3.3

17.9

28.3

71.7

66.3

33.5

Insurance

209

3.1

46.9

34.9

65.1

74.2

40.2

Advanced services for companies

3,236

7.5

57.6

55.3

44.7

50.3

29.4

Operational services for companies

21,560

44.1

23.7

23.9

76.1

46.9

12.9

Other services for companies

1,591

13.3

72.6

27.1

72.9

28.8

32.2

Personal services

6,177

25.3

65.8

38.5

61.5

32.1

36.6

Instruction and private training services

665

13.0

81.5

35.0

65.0

21.5

16.2

Health and private health services

7,001

30.8

22.3

58.0

42.0

49.8

9.7

Professional offices

996

11.0

100.0

39.0

61.0

18.4

22.4

Totals

200,589

24.5

62.4

45.7

54.3

35.6

30.6

* the absolute value reported above is intended as the potential number of hirings of personnel from non-European countries determined by the indications of companies willing to hire this personnel.

 

Let us now examine the sectorial distribution of forecasted hirings.It must be noted however that the breaking up of data by sectors presents a greater articulation than that which the INPS data relating to immigrants hired by companies would have us suppose, although a certain trend in job segregation is confirmed. As far as industry goes what is striking is the datum relating to construction, over 42,000 forcasted hirings, equal to 40% of the total-an eloquent confirmation of the dynamism of this sector. Yet it illustrates even more the difficulty of finding autochthonous labor to substitute workmen who reach retirement age. In over 90% of cases, construction hirings are concentrated in companies with less than 50 employees and 60% of the new hirings need to have prior experience. The scene prefigures the growing ethnicization of a sector that, because of its hard working conditions, young Italians tend to refuse to enter (even those without education or credentials). The heaviness of tasks, a mobility caused by the shift in building sites, the exposure to weather conditions, the relative insecurity of work, all these are factors which alienate young Italians and make it difficult to recruit for almost all of the various professions involved in construction. The metallurgical and mechanical sectors also have difficulty in finding workers. By adding together the industries which work metal with those mechanical ones, plus transportation, we arrive at 26,000 new hirings. Many surveys which are conducted on a local level demonstrate a refusal toward "factory work" by the younger generation, a refusal that particularly penalizes metallurgical/mechanical companies, one of the most important sectors of the Italian industrial system.  Indeed the percentage of foreign hirings in total is lower than the average yet there is reason to believe that the new comers are prevalently  directed toward those productive units that are involved with the heaviest aspects of the process, that have continuous working cycles, and which do not use lots of labor saving technology. These characteristics which concern metal industries are superimposed on the small size of these companies that however hire almost 70% of all hirings in the sector. The most innovative companies offer instead working conditions and career perspectives that are more advantageous than the collective imagination believes. Many companies and associations are creating promotional projects directed at young people and families, hoping that the difficulty in recruiting, (especially professional positions) can be lessened. Moreover the hiring of non Europeans in this sector is consolidated in the majority of local economic systems and all indications point to a future increase. An important condition however seems to be constituted by greater investments in professional training. The companies of this sector declare difficulties in finding the workers which they need (greater even then that of the construction sector) but these difficulties are mainly attributable to a lack of training and qualification. A small size is prevalent among textile and clothing industries that total over 10,000 hirings, like the leather and shoe industries and the wood industries. These last three sectors register difficulty in recruiting for more than 40% of their new hirings and this number rises to 49.6% in the wood industries. As regards the above considerations that relate to sectorial segregation this data points out a decided trend to the widespreadness of the foreign presence in all the industrial sectors. A trend that is very pronounced in certain regions and which could be seen as bringing possible new opportunities for immigrant women workers who now are stuck in very circumscribed parts of the labor market

If we now consider the service sector, two sectors totalize almost half the hirings: 1. Wholesale trade, retail trade and repairs, 2. Operational services for companies. While the hirings relating to the sector of operational services do not often require any experience[15] (since for the majority this is cleaning personnel), in the case of trade experience is required by more than 44% of the companies. The forecast hirings in the restaurant sector, transportation, health services, and personal services are consistent. As we have already noted we must remember that the Excelsior information system does not reveal the needs of families regarding personal services, a circumstance which would increase the weight of these sectors. In general, the data seem to confirm the trends in ethnicization which we have constantly referred to, and that finds correspondence in an analysis of the single professions.

The data relating to groups and professions constitutes a confirmation of the difficulties which companies have in finding a whole series of positions which correspond to jobs that have uncomfortable working conditions or which are seen to possess little or no prestige in the social hierarchy associated with various professions. In the eight categories of the survey, four are significantly concerned with the entry of foreign labor. In order these are: a) Non qualified personnel, in which over half the hirings are non Europeans with little difference between the different positions of the group, b) Plant operators, fixed and mobile machine operators, assembly line workers, here the hirings of foreigners represents a third of the total with higher points in certain positions, c) Professions relating to sales and services to families, but in this case the average value, 30%, hides great internal differences, d) Specialized workers, this group once again comprises positions that tend to be filled by imported labor.

Let us now consider the single professional positions. What is striking is the fact that for different positions over half the forecast hirings concerns non Europeans. These are in order: auxiliary cleaning services (56.7%),  construction workers (55.8%), general laborers (55.1%), bricklayers (52.7%) electricians (51.4%), ecological workers in garbage collection (51.3%), and construction carpenters (50%).  As we can see in Table 3, many other positions present a high incidence of the total hirings. Certain data seem to prefigure an ethnicization trend in certain jobs, this is the case with cleaning personnel, ecological workers, and general laborers. After all, international experience demonstrates how these professions tend to become those of ethnic minorities. Once that the ethnicization process has begun it tends to strengthen itself since it increases the refusal of autochthonous workers toward those jobs that are labelled "menial jobs". In certain ways this refusal is also shared by second generation immigrants who prefer an instable work situation to one that is seen as socially belittling. In other cases, the data reveals such great difficulties in recruiting that it forces the companies to widen their recruiting reservoir by utilizing a labor force that is seen as more adaptable or in some cases has a specific professionality (this is the case with nurses and health care workers) that is lower in the autochthonous supply than the demand. These recruiting difficulties mainly concern three professional positions: a) Qualified workers or technicians, especially concerning the construction and metallurgical/mechanical sectors (bricklayers, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, lathe operators, machine operators, etc.), b) Personnel who assist people (nurses, health care workers), c) Jobs that have "non-typical" work hours (security personnel, longshoremen, warehousemen, etc.).

 

 

Tab. 3 - Forecast hirings in the two year period, 1999-2000 of personnel coming from non-European countries, for professional groups and positions, percentage values.

 

Hirings

1999-2000

Of which:

 

A.V.

% of

total

Companies with > 50

employees

With

experience

Without

experience

With the need

For training

With < 25 years of age

1. Managers and Directors

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

2. Intellectual and scientific professions with a high level of specialization

1,563

4.5

45.5

62.1

37.9

57.3

14.3

3. Technical professions

5,676

4.7

33.9

55.5

44.5

52.1

22.3

Nurses

1,238

34.6

12.8

63.8

36.2

43.9

7.5

General book-keeping

293

2.6

82.3

72.7

27.3

20.1

14.3

Computer Programmers

265

5.8

56.6

41.1

58.9

58.1

38.5

Accountants

230

6.9

46.1

20.0

80.0

57.8

30.0

Technical assistance to clients

219

6.1

31.1

29.7

70.3

54.3

17.4

Salesmen/women

165

3.9

33.9

33.3

66.7

60.0

26.1

Other professions

3,266

3.6

35.1

57.3

42.7

56.7

26.9

Education and private training services

665

13.0

81.5

35.0

65.0

21.5

16.2

Private health care services

7,001

30.8

22.3

58.0

42.0

49.8

9.7

Professional services

996

11.0

100.0

39.0

61.0

18.4

22.4

Totals

200,589

24.5

62.4

45.7

54.3

35.6

30.6

4. Executive professions realating to administration and operations

6,318

7,.

59.3

37.9

62.1

35.9

39.8

Warehousemen

2,333

15.4

59.5

34.5

65.5

30.2

37.8

Administrative workers

1,424

4.7

59.6

50.4

49.6

37.0

23.2

Secretaries

638

4,.8

92.6

37.9

62.1

33.2

48.4

 

     Hirings

1999-2000

                  Of which:

 

A.V.

% of

 totals

Companies with  > 50 employees

With

experience

  Without

experience

With the need for training

 

With < 25 years of age

Warehousemen assistants

609

27.2

75.4

24.8

75.2

29.1

76.2

Freight movers

205

10.7

26.8

18.0

82.0

53.7

58.0

Computer operators

157

6.4

75.2

61.8

38.2

45.2

49.7

Other professions

952

4.4

30.0

36.3

63.7

49.3

35.2

5. Sales positions and Family services

52,008

30.1

46.9

40.3

59.7

42.4

26.7

Cleaning personnel

19,288

46.1

33.7

24.3

75.7

42.3

15.5

Sales-clerks

9,066

19.4

52.8

52.9

47.1

47.8

32.8

Waiters/Waitresses

2,575

30.7

86.6

58.5

41.5

17.9

43.1

Health care assistants

2,513

45.7

23.8

69.8

30.2

56.3

12.1

Barmen

1,533

32.6

95.7

49.4

50.6

26.3

51.7

Security guards

1,215

41.5

18.2

15.3

84.7

85.9

8.6

Chefs

892

23.8

83.4

69.8

30.2

16.4

16.0

Other professions

14,926

25.3

52.7

44.5

55.5

40.7

36.8

6. Specialized workers

53,703

29.5

82.9

61.6

38.4

27.6

30.4

Bricklayers

12,137

52.7

93.8

71.6

28.4

12.6

15.1

Builing carpenters

4,319

50.0

89.1

75.8

24.2

20.2

10.8

Carpenters

3,066

37.6

90.4

55.8

44.2

33.6

37.2

Plumbers

3,019

49.3

96.6

69.5

30.5

27.7

32.8

Electricians

2,234

51.4

88.7

50.8

49.2

29.9

35.4

System Electricians

1,987

49.4

88.0

58.1

41.9

29.0

45.9

Maintenance mechanics

1,028

15.7

52.9

60.5

39.5

40.4

51.3

Other professions

25,913

214

74.6

55.6

44.4

34.3

37.4

 

Hirings

1999-2000

Of which:

 

A. V.

% of

totals

Companies with > 50

employees

With

experience

Without

experience

With the need for training

 

With < 25 Years of age

7. Plant operators, fixed and mobile machinists, assembly workers

43,524

30.9

58.7

43.5

56.5

43.1

33.8

General production workers

8,908

26.3

36.3

31.7

68.3

47.1

38.3

Truck drivers

3,945

18.7

81.9

70.0

30.0

15.5

8.4

Lathe operators

2,501

49.0

86.8

57.7

42.3

39.1

36.6

Assistant machinists

2,098

48.3

75.9

38.7

61.3

45.5

35.9

Assistant mechanical workers

1,810

46.8

80.9

35.4

64.6

38.0

41.0

Operators of mechanical production machines

1,667

42.7

57.9

45.4

54.6

53.9

43.7

Industrial machine assemblyists

1,072

40.3

38.5

55.3

44.7

37.2

27.8

Other professions

21,523

32.5

58.0

42.3

57.7

46.5

34.9

8. Non-qualified personnel

37,791

51.1

64.4

32.3

67.7

25.9

32.7

Construction laborers

10,857

55.8

91.9

43.2

56.8

17.0

34.0

Porters

3,475

48.1

16.0

22.1

77.9

25.2

32.1

General laborers

2,991

55.1

62.9

26.2

73.8

35.2

32.8

Machine operators ready-made cloting

2,618

46.2

75.6

42.9

57.1

38.6

39.2

Ecological operators garbage collection

2,580

51.3

7.2

8.5

91.5

38.3

3.3

Cargo loaders

2,139

48,4

66.2

22.1

77.9

20.4

39.6

Auxiliary cleaning personnel

1,836

56,7

7.8

14.3

85.7

10.3

4.7

Other professions

11295

48.2

72.5

34.4

65.6

29.9

39.9

Totals

200,589

24.5

62.4

45.7

54.3

35.6

30.6

* the absolute value reported above is intended as a potential number of forecasted hirings of non-European personnel on the basis of indications given by those companies willing to hire this personnel.

The dash (--) indicates an insignificant value.

 

As we have pointed out many times before, the participation of foreigners in the Italian labor market is demonstrated in different ways in the national territory. The geographic distribution of new hirings shows that the North East has the first position (both in absolute terms and in the incidence of total hirings) which concerns both the industrial sector and the service sector wherein foreign work entries arrive at 1/3 of the total, illustrating a decidely higher incidence than other geographic locations. Helping create this result are also the high percentages of six sectors: operational services for companies (54.5%), private health care services (44%), tourism and restaurant work (42.5%), personal services (36.5%), transportation and communications (33.5%), and the wholesale and retail trade (31.4%).

Concerning the North East, the data relating to the industrial sector is even more significant. It shows how the use of foreign labor crosses the different sectors to the point that it greatly mitigates the impression of segregation which stands out in the INPS statistics on foreigners employed by companies. In many ways this consideration may be extended to the Center, wood working industries, textiles and clothing, leather and shoes, show as in the North East a particular propensity to using foreign labor, higher than the metallurgical/mechanical sectors. What we observe is an incipient work entry process of foreign workers into the web of difffused industrialization of the North East Central regions which realizes the typical made in Italy products. In all divisions, excepting the South and Islands, rubber and plastic industries register a higher incidence of foreign hirings, higher than the average of other industries. The unhealthy aspects of the working conditions is the reason for this datum, making the foreign labor force an irreplaceable resource for the working of specialized companies and local systems with this type of production.

 Construction represents the only sector which from North to South without distinction registers a percentage incidence of foreign job entries close to 40%. Actually the highest value is that of the South and Islands, where 18,501 hirings of non-Europeans 80% of all those forecast in the industrial sector! In that division the process of occupational segregation is more pronounced than in the rest of the country. In the North West hirings in this sector are 29% of the total, in the North East 20%, and in the Center 36%.

Practically speaking, the more advanced the process of stablization is for foreign labor then the more its presence tends to be found in the different industrial sectors, reflecting local economic traditions.

 

 

Tab.4 - Forecast hirings in the two year period, 1999-2000 of personnel from non-European countries, by sectors and geographic areas.

 

North West

North East

Center

South/Islands

 

 A. V.*

% of total

A.V.*

% of total

A.V.*

% of total

A.V.*

% of

total

Industry

31,269

24.3

40,483

36.0

19,131

29.7

22,697

24.3

Mining

132

25.2

272

57.0

85

19.7

143

20.1

Food, drink, and tobacco industries

748

12.9

2,757

40.5

760

22.9

406

6.1

Textiles and clothing industries

3,305

28.9

3,602

42.2

2,675

42.2

488

6.8

Leather and shoe industries

225

26.1

1,523

46.5

1,690

36.9

248

9.7

Wood and wood product industries (excluding furniture)

496

21.0

1,824

54.0

689

47.2

176

7.7

Paper and printing industries

530

10.8

756

24.2

322

13.6

91

5.4

Coal and petroleum industries

25

8.8

27

19.4

--

--

--

--

Chemical and synthetic industries

857

13.1

720

31.3

298

10.6

58

4.5

Rubber and plastic industries

1,772

31.7

1,451

40.9

561

34.8

169

9.7

Non-metal mineral industries

689

25.6

2,158

32.8

581

22.2

638

18.2

Metal industries

5,654

23.3

5,995

34.4

1,556

23.8

935

11.9

Mechanical industries and transportation

4,691

21.2

5,265

28.1

1,238

22.4

698

11.5

Electrical and electronic  industrise

2,273

17.5

2,582

29.2

571

14.3

220

6.3

Other manufacturing industries

639

15.2

3,227

41.7

1,086

28.8

237

9.3

Energy production, gas and water

213

13.4

250

21.1

119

12.1

133

11.5

Construction

9,020

39.8

8,074

39.4

6,899

38.4

18,051

40.6

 

 

North West

North East

Center

South/Islands

 

A.V.*

% of total

V.A.*

% of total

V.A.*

% of total

A.V..*

% of total

Services

25,602

17.7

37,464

33.6

13,998

16.5

9,945

12.7

Wholesale and retail trade and repairs

4,859

11.3

10,821

31.4

3,288

13.1

2,718

9.9

Hotels, tourist villages, restaurants, bars and cafeterias

2,202

16.1

6,213

42.5

3,986

42.8

879

11.0

Transportation, travel agencies, mail and communications

2,526

15.5

5,068

33.5

1,772

13.9

716

6.8

Credit and financial activities

216

3.3

132

3.2

119

3.7

59

2.8

Insurance

122

3.8

28

2.0

44

3.4

15

1.7

Advanced services for companies

1,615

8.2

722

9.4

612

6.5

287

4.4

Operational services for companies

7,990

47.6

8,390

54.5

2,306

25.8

2,874

36.8

Other services for companies

662

12.9

419

18.1

208

9.6

302

12.6

Personal services

1,921

26.5

2,257

36.5

965

17.1

1,034

19.2

Education and private training

222

16.6

155

16.0

74

6.2

214

13.5

Health and private health care services

2,849

35.5

2,974

44.0

427

11.1

751

18.3

Professional offices

418

12.4

285

11.9

197

10.1

96

7.3

Total

56,871

20.8

77,947

34.8

33,129

22.2

32,642

19.0

* the absolute value reported above is intended as a potential number of hirings of non-European personnel on the basis of indications given by companies that are willing to hire this personnel.

 

Even in the case of the tertiary the North East presents a greater articulation than the other areas. In the Center it is above all tourism, hotel, and restaurant sectors which request imported labor (42.8%), more than the operational services for companies sector (25.8%). The latter is the highest tertiary sector in the North West regions (47.6%) and in the South and Islands (36.8%). These sectors are joined by those that request foreigners in the personal services sector (26.5% North West and 19.2% for the South and Islands) and for health services (35.5% in North West and 18.3% in South and Islands). It goes without saying that if this data had included the requests for personal service workers coming directly from families it would have increased the number of forecast hirings, particularly in the North West, South and Islands.

Because of space limitations, in this chapter we will not conduct other analyses concerning the territorial breaking up of needs with the characteristics of forecast hirings (for example, from the point of view of the requisites requested by professional positions and the forecast training needs). We will however examine the provincial distribution of new hirings. Table 5 presents a list of the first 10 provinces that concur in new hirings of foreigners, obtained by selecting the provinces that reach the level of 5,000 new hirings. In the first places of the ranking are four large cities which are county seats, then four Venetian provinces, one in Emilia Romagna and one in Lombardy. If we pass from this ranking to the one that is constructed by utilizing the percentage of non-European hirings in the total of forecast job entries [Table 5], the picture is redefined in a significant way. Milan, Rome and Turin together total over 32,000 new hirings of foreigners and yet they present a percentage incidence of the latter that is lower (in the case of Milan and Rome), or slightly higher (the case of Turin) than what is registered in the Southern regions. Viceversa, in 24 provinces this percentage is above 30% of forecast job entries. Among these there is no Lombardy city even if this region has had an important role in the process of job entry for immigrants in the Italian economic system. This role clearly stands out if we consider absolute values, 36,301 new hirings, equal to 18% of the national total. Yet Brescia, the province with the highest propensity to use foreign labor, arrives "only" at 25.6%. Bergamo, third province after Milan and Brescia has 4,268 new entries, an incidence equal to 21.8%, and Lecco which has very low levels of unemployment (some say the lowest in the world) presents an incidence equal to 21.5%.

 

 

Tab.5 - Forecast hirings in the two year period, 1999-2000 of personnel from non-European countries, ranking of provinces with over 5,000 forecast hirings

Provinces

Hirings 1999-2000 A.V.*

Hirings      1999-2000

% of total

Artisanal sector

A.V..

Milan

15,676

18.1

2,071

Rome

8,704

18.2

757

Bologna

8,342

33.5

1,064

Turin

8,161

20.2

1,381

Vicenza

6,340

33.4

1,601

Treviso

6,186

35.6

1,701

Modena

5,801

33.7

1,200

Brescia

5,608

25.6

1,718

Padua

5,577

33.7

1,619

Venice

5,051

35.0

1,129

Total

200,589

24.5

49,922

* the absolute value reported above is intended as the potential number of personnel hirings of non-Europeans determined on the basis of the indications of companies willing to hire this personnel.

 

Table 6 illustrates the fact that the regions of Triveneto and Emilia Romagna register (together with the two provinces of Rieti and Vercelli) in percentage terms the highest propensity to use foreign labor. In more explicit terms, all the provinces of these regions register an incidence of non-European hirings above (and often significantly above) 30% of the total and in certain cases the number arrives at 40%. This quota has no correspondence on an international level, not even in countries that traditionally import foreign labor.

Beyond the local pecularities that we have already noted, there is a specific motive of interest offered by a comparison between the two tables. It illustrates the fact that local societies which present the highest capacity to absorb foreign labor (Milan and Rome for example, which have tens of thousands of personal service jobs, excluded from the present survey) are not necessarily those in which the difficulties of recruiting labor are the most noticed and the pressure of new flows more decided. This is an aspect that must not be underrated or the penalty will be the risk of interepreting in a distorted way the signals that come from extremely dynamic economic systems that have a modest sized occupational base (as is the case with the the two provinces in the ranking, Rovigo and Belluno).

 

Tab.6 - Forecast hirings for the two year period, 1999-2000 of personnel from non-European countries, ranking of provinces with an incidence of % on the total of new hirings above 30%.

Province

Hirings 1999-2000 A.V. *

Hirings 1999-2000

% of the total

In the artisanal sector

A.V..

Rovigo

1,226

39.5

488

Belluno

1,648

38.7

474

Pordenone

2.653

37.9

590

Ravenna

3,030

37.7

558

Forlì

2,751

36.9

792

Trento

3,233

36.7

799

Rimini

1,865

36.5

525

Bolzano

3,616

36.2

902

Gorizia

929

35.7

183

Treviso

6,186

35.6

1,701

Parma

3,243

35.4

627

Ferrara

1,847

35.1

502

Venice

5,051

35.0

1,129

Udine

3,461

34.8

963

Piacenza

1,577

34.4

375

Modena

5,801

33.7

1,200

Padua

5,577

33.7

1,619

Bologna

8,342

33.5

1,064

Vicenza

6,340

33.4

1,601

Verona

4,753

33.3

1,143

Reggio Emilia

3,644

33.1

843

Rieti

360

32.3

135

Vercelli

1,148

30.5

204

Trieste

1,174

30.2

182

Total

200,589

24.5

49,922

* The absolute value reported must be understood as a potential number of hirings of personnel from outside the European Union determined on the basis of the indications of those companies which are willing to hire them.

 

We must once again emphasize the significance of the forecasts gathered by the Excelsior survey. These data do not measure actual hirings of non-European Union workers but the willingness to hire this personnel. It could be in some cases merely a declaration of open mindedness and universalism, given by the affirmation that there is no preclusion based on race and citizenship. Often on the basis of past studies and research the data registers the knowledge of an added need that cannot be satisfied by the local supply. They signal therefore, the existence of a lack of balance in the labor market that refers to territories, sectors, and specific jobs. This lack of balance has evidently reached a significant level, it arrives at about a fourth of the professional needs of Italian companies and almost 40% in the case of certain provinces in the North East.

Evidently, the use of imported labor cannot, and should not, represent the only practicable solution. Courageous strategies of de-localization and a return to internal migrations from the South could constitute valid alternatives which in certain ways would be positive (it is not by chance that the many requests for new entries in 2000 soon became a debate about favoring the transfer of unemployed from the South). These seem to be costly alternatives, not only in economic terms, but above all in planning, since they intersect with the complex choices and strategies of companies and local systems. This problem cannot but be intertwined with important long term themes such as the competitive re-positioning of companies, the ability of local societies to receive people, the efficacy of institutional regulations, an effective will to fight illegal labor ("lavoro nero") and so on. On the other hand, recent literature on the Southern question has bluntly shown that to solve the unemployment problem in the South means finding a way to instill a new work culture, especially among the young. Internal migrations and foreign migrations are not then two opposing solutions, but two components of the same challenge. This challenge is to guarantee a real regulation of the labor market that follows the needs of companies and at the same time protects occupations and the weakest members of society.

 

3.2.4 Final Considerations

 

All the data gathered by the Excelsior information sytem confirms (besides the limits that we can recognize in forecast surveys) certain already acquired aspects that are shared by the Italian population. Among these are: the structural character of foreign labor needs relating to widespread difficulties in recruiting personnel, the territorial diversification of needs that mirrors the dynamism of the economic system and local productive vocations,and the trend for an ethnicization of certain jobs which prefigures the risk of a further strengthening of the refusal of locals to fill these jobs.

Nevertheless, the data makes evident certain aspects that are not yet clearly visible and these can be used to define the future scene of immigrant work in Italy. In the first place, the progessive spreading out of foreigners into a number of production sectors which is verified in parallel with a territorial stabilization of immigrant populations. A consequence of this phenomena for the future will be the opportunity for female labor to work in the industrial sector (for example in textiles and foodprocessing) instead of being segregated to cleaning and domestic labor as is now the case. The existence of a great need for qualified workers and technicians is confirmed, and also that of personnel with nursing and personal care skills which illustrates the need to invest in the training of immigrant labor. On the basis of our analysis, training initiatives should aim at building both "technical" and "meta-professional" skills. Nothing blocks them from being developed before immigrating to Italy with the collaboration of the authorities of the country of origin. This aspect could become an important piece of the entry quota policy as it is hoped for in several of the bilateral agreements that have been signed in the last years and forecast in the 2001 entry quota decree. The Excelsior data signal also the beginning of a small need (which should not be ignored for its "cultural" significance) for highly qualified personnel which is similar to the international trends (the 2001 entry quota decree will provide for the first time special quotas of foreign workers such as nurses and new economy technicians). The data especially confirms the opportunity for involving local societies and in their context, local companies, not only in the accounting of professional needs[16], but also in the planning of paths of job entry which comes with the knowledge of the relationship that unites the sphere of economic inclusion with the social integration sphere. But to make that planning actually come true there must first be a construction of collective consensus around immigration policy and immigrants, which up to now has been conditioned (both in the elaboration and implementation) by allarming representations of this phenomena[17]. This objective reminds us of the companies' responsibilities since thay are the primary beneficiaries of the resource of immigration. They are, above all, the principal subjects able to appreciate the possibility of using this resource in a continuous way and hence of enhancing the value of the economic potential that immigration represents.

 



* Laura Zanfrini is professor of Sociology of Interethnic Relations and of Sociology of Economic processes.

[1]This investigation was undertaken thanks to a collaboration between our Foundation and the Unioncamere. The report is published in,  Zanfrini, L., 2000, "Programmare" per competere. I fabbisogni professionali delle imprese italiane e la politica di programmazione dei flussi migratori, Milan: Franco Angeli.

[2] Sciortino, G., L'ambizione della frontiera. Le politiche di controllo migratorio in Europa, Angeli, Milano, 2001.

[3] The blockade policies characterize the European situation but the securization of the question  is a tendency that goes well beyond the borders of our continent.

[4] Where we also remembered how the strengthening of these instruments on the part of the Italian government has produced tangible results in the control of illegal/clandestine immigration.

[5] In the 1997 and 1998 editions of the ISMU Report we examined the processes of the social construction of illegality which in the Italian case transforms migrants into illegals since for a certain time they  may possess sojourn permits which they cannot renew if they are workers in the informal/illegal economy ("in nero").

[6] Sciortino, G., L'ambizione della frontiera.

[7] Zanfrini, L., Gli effetti perversi di um modello di sviluppo "performante": i giovani di Montpellier "issus de l'immigration", "Studi di Sociologia", XXXIX, n. 1, 2001.

[8] We should recall the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Convention, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

[9] The debate on these problems exploded after the circulation of the UN Report which foresaw for the year 2050 a decrease of population in Italy from 57 to 41 million people, in other words a decrease of 28%. At the same time the lengthening of the average life span will bring the percentage of people over 65 years of age up to 31% from 18% and the averagemedian age will be 53 instead of 41. To compensate for those tendencies it would take requesting many more foreign immigrants than those who spontaneously want to come-12 million people up to the year 2050.

[10] Colasanto, M. - Ambrosini, M. (a cura di), L'integrazione invisibile, Vita e Pensiero, Milano, 1993.

[11] Zanfrini, L., Discrimination in the Labour Market, ISMU, The Fifth Italian Report on Migrations 1999.

[12] Zanfrini, L., Discrimination in the labour market.

[13] For the writing on this point we have particularly referred to, Reyneri, E. (coordinator), Migrants' Insertion in the Informal Economy, Deviant Behaviour and the Impact on Receiving Countries, CE/DG XII - Science, Research and Development, TSER Program, Contract No. SOE2-CT95-3005. On the same theme see also the contributions by Salvatore Palidda in the various editions of ISMU Report.

[14] For a complete analysis see the already cited volume, Zanfrini, L., "Programmare" per competere... See this volume for a clarification of the methodological aspects which for reasons of space cannot be discussed in this paper.

[15] It must be noted that the difficulties in recruiting are caused in 53.1% of the cases to the pay levels which are seen as not adeguate for worker expectations.

[16] The inter-ministerial committee for migration policies has provided for the participation of Regions, Provinces, and Cities in the procedures that define annual quotas.

[17] The data that is reviewed in chapter 2.5 of The Fifth Italian Report on Migrations 1999 written by G. Valtolina (The attitudes of the Italian society towards immigration) demonstrates once again how the perception of this phenomena is shaped by its association with problems of security and criminality.